home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
- CURRENT_MEETING_REPORT_
-
-
- Reported by Ralph Droms/Bucknell
-
- DHC Minutes
-
- Modifications and Extensions to DHCP
-
- The Working Group agreed to the following changes and additions to DHCP.
- The DHCP Internet Draft will be edited to reflect these changes.
-
- Changes to Protocol
-
- The client--server protocol has been changed slightly, so that the
- client first broadcasts a message to locate available DHCP servers, and
- then selects one of the responding servers from which the client obtains
- its configuration parameters.
-
- Protocol Messages
-
- Corresponding to the changes to the protocol summarized in section 1.1,
- the DHCP messages have been redefined as shown in table 1.
-
- Client--Server Interaction
-
-
- 1. Client broadcasts DHCPDISCOVER on local physical subnet.
- DHCP/BOOTP relay agents pass the broadcast on to DHCP servers not
- on the same physical subnet.
-
- 2. Servers respond with DHCPOFFER message with all configuration
- parameters including network address. Servers need not reserve the
- offered network address, although the protocol will work more
- efficiently if the server avoids allocating the offered network
- address to another client. The DHCPOFFER message is ``unicast'' to
- the client (using the BOOTP relay agent if necessary).
-
- 3. Client receives DHCPOFFER message from server. Client may choose
- to wait for multiple responses. Client chooses one server from
- which to request configuration parameters, based on offered
- configuration parameters in the DHCPOFFER messages. Client
- broadcasts a DHCPREQUEST message, specifying the desired server and
- desired network address in vendor extension fields. This
- DHCPREQUEST message is broadcast and relayed through BOOTP relay
- agents. Any DHCP/BOOTP relay agents must ensure that any messages
- from this client are forwarded to the same set of DHCP servers to
- ensure that the DHCPREQUEST message reaches the selected DHCP
- server.
-
- The client times out and retransmits the DHCPDISCOVER message if
- the client receives no DHCPOFFER messages.
-
-
- 1
-
-
-
-
-
- ___Message_________________________________Use__________________________
-
-
- DHCPDISCOVER Client broadcast to locate available
- servers.
- DHCPOFFER Server to client in response to DHCPDISCOVER
- with offer of configuration parameters.
- DHCPREQUEST Client broadcast to servers requesting
- offered parameters from one server and
- implicitly declining offers from all others.
- DHCPACK Server to client with configuration
- parameters, including committed network
- address.
- DHCPNAK Server to client declining request for
- configuration parameters (e.g., requested
- network address already allocated).
- DHCPDECLINE Client to server indicating configuration
- parameters (e.g., network address) invalid.
- DHCPRELEASE Client to server relinquishing network
- address and cancelling remaining lease.
-
- Table 1: DHCP Messages
-
- 4. Servers receive the DHCPREQUEST broadcast from the client. The
- servers not selected in the DHCPREQUEST message use the message as
- notification that the client has declined that server's offer. The
- server selected in the DHCPREQUEST commits the binding for the
- client to persistent storage and responds with a DHCPACK message
- containing the configuration parameters for the requesting client.
- The server inserts a unique lease identification cookie as a vendor
- extension.
-
- If the selected server is unable to satisfy the DHCPREQUEST (e.g.,
- the requested network address has been allocated), the server
- responds with a DHCPNAK.
-
- 5. Client receives the DHCPACK with configuration parameters. The
- client performs a last minute check on the parameters (e.g., ARP
- for allocated network address), and notes the duration of the lease
- and the lease identification cookie specified in the DHCPACK
- message. At this point, the client is configured.
-
- If the client detects a problem with the parameters in the DHCPACK
- message, the client sends a DHCPDECLINE message to the server and
- restarts the configuration process.
-
-
-
- 2
-
-
-
-
-
-
- _________Extension_________Tag________Values________Length_
- DHCP message type 51 1=DHCPDISCOVER [3]
- 2=DHCPOFFER
- 3=DHCPREQUEST
- 4=DHCPDECLINE
- 5=DHCPACK
- 6=DHCPNAK
- 7=DHCPRELEASE
-
- Lease identifier cookie 52 address [6]
-
- Server identifier 53 address [6]
-
- Parameter request vector 54 256 bit (32 octet) [34]
- vector
-
- Parameter request list 55 n parameter tags [n+2]
-
-
-
- Table 2: New Vendor Extensions
-
- If the client receives a DHCPNAK message, the client restarts the
- configuration process.
-
- The client times out and retransmits the DHCPREQUEST message if the
- client receives neither a DHCPACK or a DHCPNAK message.
-
- 6. A client may choose to relinquish its lease on a network address by
- sending a DHCPRELEASE to the server. The client identifies the
- lease to be released with the lease identification cookie.
-
-
- New Vendor Extensions
-
- The modifications to DHCP require some new vendor extensions, as listed
- in table 2.
-
- Use of Vendor Extensions
-
- A client can fill in vendor extensions in a DHCPDISCOVER and DHCPREQUEST
- to supply hints or request specific values from a server. For example,
- the client can fill in the 'IP address' vendor extensions to suggest a
- remembered network address The server fills in vendor extensions in
- DHCPDISCOVER and DHCPACK messages to supply specific configuration
- values to the client.
-
- A client can also request specific configuration parameters without
- supplying hints through the ``parameter request vector'' and ``parameter
- request list'' vendor extensions. In the parameter request vector, a
- one bit in position n in the vector represents an explicit request for
- the vendor extensions parameter with tag n. The parameter request list
-
- 3
-
-
-
-
-
- is a list of vendor extension tags explicitly requested by the client.
-
- Lease Durations and Clock Drift
-
- The algorithm for lease duration interpretation given in subsection 6.1
- of the DHCP Internet Draft is correct, assuming the client and server
- clocks are stable relative to each other. If there is drift between the
- two clocks, the server may still consider the lease expired before the
- client does. To compensate, the server may return a different lease
- duration to the client than the server commits to its local database of
- client information.
-
- Lease Renewal Times
-
- The client attempts to renew its lease from the allocating server
- beginning at time T1and from any available server at time T2. Times T1
- and T2 are configurable by the server through vendor extensions.
- T1defaults to (0.5 * duration_of_lease). T2 defaults to (0.875 *
- duration_of_lease).
-
- XID Field
-
- The XID field must be interpreted by the server relative to individual
- clients, not as a globally unique value.
-
- Retransmission
-
- The client drives all retransmissions of the protocol. The protocol
- document still needs explicit descriptions of retransmission and
- exponential backoff algorithms.
-
- ``ciaddr'' (Clarification)
-
- The ``ciaddr'' field is to be filled in by the client only if the client
- has explicit knowledge of its network address. The client can supply a
- hint or a preferred network address through the IP address vendor
- extension.
-
- If a server receives a DHCPDISCOVER or DHCPREQUEST message with an
- invalid ``ciaddr'', the server silently discards the message.
-
- Use of DHCP in Hosts with Multiple Interfaces
-
- A host with multiple network interfaces must use DHCP through each
- interface independently to obtain configuration information parameters
- for those separate interfaces.
-
- DHCP and BOOTP Clients
-
- Use of the vendor extensions defined in DHCP is not restricted to DHCP
- clients and servers. Existing BOOTP clients and servers may choose to
- use the newly defined vendor extensions. The one restriction is that
- BOOTP clients MAY NOT use the ``DHCP client'' vendor extensions. Only
- clients using DHCP may use the ``DHCP client'' vendor extension.
-
- 4
-
-
-
-
-
- Implementations
-
- Several members of the DHC Working Group indicated that they intend to
- work on independent implementations of DHCP. Completion of at least one
- of these implementations is expected before the Spring, 1992 IETF
- meeting.
-
- Future Work
-
- Greg Minshall agreed to develop a definition of the DHCP server-server
- protocol. Jesse Walker and Walt Wimer agreed to collaborate on the
- definition of a MIB for DHCP servers.
-
- Attendees
-
- Steve Alexander stevea@i88.isc.com
- Richard Basch basch@mit.edu
- David Bridgham dab@asylum.sf.ca.us
- Gregory Bruell gob@shiva.com
- Richard Cogger rhx@cornellc.cit.cornell.edu
- Steve Deering deering@xerox.com
- Ralph Droms droms@bucknell.edu
- Karen Frisa karen.frisa@andrew.cmu.edu
- Robert Gilligan gilligan@eng.sun.com
- Ron Jacoby rj@sgi.com
- Douglas Kerr dougk@mtxinu.com
- Michael Khalandovsky mlk@ftp.com
- Holly Knight holly@apple.com
- Nik Langrind nik@shiva.com
- Joshua Littlefield josh@cayman.com
- Greg Minshall minshall@wc.novell.com
- William Nowicki nowicki@legato.com
- Michael O'Dell mo@bellcore.com
- Bradford Parker brad@cayman.com
- Mark Saake saake@llnl.gov
- Jesse Walker walker@eider.enet@decpa.dec.com
- Jonathan Wenocur jhw@shiva.com
- Walter Wimer walter.wimer@andrew.cmu.edu
- John Wobus jmwobus@suvm.acs.syr.edu
-
-
-
- 5
-